Monday, January 17, 2005

Inferno: Canto 8 -- Circles 5

In Greek myth, we often stumble across Charon as the boatman of Styx, not Phlegyas, and it was into Charon's palm the soul would have to place a coin in order to secure transit to the Underworld. Without the coin, the dead would have to wander the banks of the river for a hundred years (so, who said you can't, or shouldn't, take it with you when you go?). Dante's placement of Charon at the river Acheron, though, is truer to the original myth (look at the names), and his placement of Phlegyas in Styx rather than in Phlegethon, is also correct though some versions of the myth place Phlegyas over the eponymous river.
("The River Styx" Lotta Tjernström, 2002)

Since this is our second river to cross, I'll precede Dante's explanation of the rivers to prepare you for it. In myth, there are five rivers in the Underworld, Acheron, Styx, Phlegethon, Cocytus, and Lethe. Dante puts four of these rivers in hell and moves Lethe to Purgatory. Acheron is the river of woe, Styx is the river of hate, Phlegethon is the river of fire, and Cocytus is the river of lamentations. Lethe, the river of forgetfulness, removes the memory of sin in Dante's cosmology, so it's appropriate that it come after the various penitential rites of the mountain. Dante adds a sixth river in the underworld, also in purgatory, called Eunoe, which strengthens the memory of the good.

As Dante crosses Styx, Filippo Argenti raises himself for a view and is berated by Dante, who prays that he "may weep and wail to all eternity,/ for I know you, hell-dog, filthy as you are" (37-9). Virgil's praise of Dante's righteous indignation here contrasts with his approval of Dante's sympathy with Paulo and Francesca for a very specific reason -- Dante's reaction is a moderation of the extreme in both instances. In the case of Paulo and Francesca, who were overcome by immoderate affection, Dante shows a moderate affection (swoon though he did). Here, Filippo Argenti suffers the torment of the wrathful, and Dante's righteous indignation against Argenti is a moderation of wrath. Righteous indignation is what Christ exhibited at the temple when he chased out the moneylenders for turning his father's house into a den of thieves. It is for this reason that Virgil invokes the "Blessed is she who bore you" phrase that parallels Dante's indignation to Christ's.

As the boat approaches the shore, we see the City of Dis, the capital city of hell. Once the poets enter Dis, they leave forever upper hell (sins of the She-Wolf of Incontinence -- bestial sins, really, since they deal with the passions overcoming reason) and begin their descent into lower hell. Geographically, this is a relevant crossing, then, because the countryside is the habitus of animals and those who tend them while the city is the habitus of man. The sins of the city, then, are those which are peculiar to man because he alone has the power of reason and can pervert that reason based on his own free will. It is the perversion of reason that leads to violence and fraud, both of which have their own divisions through which we'll be walking.

It is also at the gates of Dis that we see Virgil for the first time unable to overcome an obstacle. The rebellious angels, those who chose Satan's side in the war in heaven, refuse to open the gates -- we find these are the same angels that tried to bar Christ's path when he broke open the first gate through which the poets entered the vestibule. Virgil, unable to use the power that reason has over passion to defeat the angels seeks divine assistance for the first time. Those of you who are fond of discovering a paradox will enjoy this one -- Virgil, a damned soul, offers up a prayer. By what power is he able to do so in a land where prayers cannot be uttered?

S.

12 Comments:

Blogger Fr_Martin_2B said...

THE WRATHFUL AND THE WRATH OF GOD
Something that struck me in this canto is how Dante seems to be becoming quite a bit more comfortable in his surroundings than before. I was quite suprised that when he was approached by Filippo not only did he not swoon like a southern bell, but he actually rebukes the shade. When he and Virgil start tag-teaming this wrathful soul I was concerned that they might be catching some of the wrath that was in the air. So I asked myself, "what is the difference between justice and wrath?" After all, we know that there is the "wrath of God" in the Bible, so how do we find a balance? I found a website authored by a protestant minister at http://allanturner.com/love.html . He writes;

The God Of Love And Wrath

by Allan Turner

Because He is love, some are inclined to think that God does not, and will not, become involved with punishment. Punishment, it is believed, is somehow inconsistent with love. We are told that if God were to inflict punishment, He would no longer be a God of love. Those who take this position exhibit their ignorance of both the character of God and the nature of punishment.

The God of the Bible identifies Himself as a God of love (I John 4:8) and a God of wrath, vengeance and punishment (Romans 1:18; II Thessalonians 1:6-9). Now, if God identifies Himself as being both a God of love and wrath, then who are we to argue with Him? Instead of arguing against it, we ought to try to understand how these two attributes coexist.

Wrath Is A Requirement Of Justice

When God executes wrath, vengeance, and punishment, it is only in a judicial sense that He does so. When God, as lawgiver, executes judgment, justice demands that one be either vindicated or punished, i.e., one receives either a “blessing” or a “curse” (cf. Deuteronomy 11:26-28; James 4:12). In this sense, punishment is retribution (viz., “the wages of sin...,” Romans 6:23) to vindicate Law and satisfy Justice, and is, consequently, an action based upon the principle of Righteousness (“It is a righteous thing with God to recompense tribulation to them that trouble you,” II Thessalonians 1:6).

Without reward and punishment, there is no justice. Without justice, there is no judgment. Without judgment, there is no law. Without law, there is no lawgiver. Finally, if there is no lawgiver, then there is no God like the one described in the Bible. Consider what the Bible has said on this: “Because He has appointed a day on which He will judge the world in righteousness by the Man whom He has ordained” (Acts 17:31); “For we must all appear before the judgment seat of Christ, that each one may receive the things done in the body, according to what he has done, whether good or bad. Knowing, therefore, the terror of the Lord, we persuade men...” (II Corinthians 5:10,11a).

The Primary Design Of Punishment Is Punishment

Too often, punishment is thought to be remedial. In other words, many think the primary purpose of punishment is to make one better. Although it is true that correction or reform can be-—and in some cases is-—a residual effect of punishment, it has as its major objective the vindication of Law and the satisfaction of Justice. If this is not true, then our atonement through Jesus' vicarious death is eliminated. This ought to be obvious. If the punishment the Lord experienced on the cross was actually designed to make those who rightly deserved it better-—and not to vindicate Law and satisfy Justice-—then there was no way He could have experienced that for us. On the other hand, if punishment was designed to uphold Law and satisfy Justice, then it was possible for Christ to be “the propitiation for our sins” (I John 4:10). This is exactly what happened. The vicarious death of Jesus on the cross made it possible for God to give those who actually deserved the punishment a clean slate as a result of their faith in His Son. Because Jesus paid the full price for our redemption, Justice was done (i.e., God remained just) and God was able to justify those who exercise faith in Jesus (Romans 3:25,26).

Punishment Is The Reward Of Unrighteousness

There is absolutely no reason why man cannot keep God's Law perfectly. The Bible makes no excuse for man's sinfulness. It simply teaches us that although man has the capacity to do so, he has not, does not, and will not keep Law perfectly, i.e., “all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God” (cf. Romans 3:20, 23). Sin, we are taught in the Bible and know in our hearts, is not forced or coerced, but is clearly a voluntary action (James 1:14,15) committed by creatures of free will (Joshua 24:15), who will be judged by a just God Who will vindicate His Law (Deuteronomy 32:35; He-brews 10:30).

Punishment, then, is “the just recompense of reward” one receives for unrighteousness (Hebrews 2:2). Therefore, those who would make arguments against God's punishment of those who violate His law because such would make Him, in their opinion, less a God of love and more like a vicious ogre, fail not only to understand the character of God and the primary purpose of punishment, but they really fail to appreciate the most magnificent manifestation of God's love ever bestowed upon man-kind—the sacrificial death of His only begotten Son (John 3:16; I John 4:10)."

I guess my thought for the day is that we as disciples of Christ and as future ministers have a very fine line to walk between rebuking in justice as Jesus did, while not giving into the very vice which we try to avoid. After all, as Psalm 78:38 states, "Yet he, being merciful, forgave their sin and destroyed them not; Often he turned back his anger and let none of his wrath be roused."

January 17, 2005 2:17 PM  
Blogger atskro said...

I found Dante's berating of a soul discomforting. Though we are to reject evil, We are not to hate the sinner. I would think that Dante is contributing to the evil sinning. Even though the person who sinned chose to be there. I still though think it is not right to rub his nose in it per say. I know that Dante had personal/political reasons for doing it. Though they chose to be in hell and may even still hate or victimize us we are to accept victimhood for the rest of the good out there. Since Dante is still alive he is still contributing to the good through grace. This is why reason fall short with Virgil praising him. We need grace to think kindly of the others even if they have totally reject God. God still loves them but they have closed themselves total off from the love and therefore there is no turning back.

January 17, 2005 7:57 PM  
Blogger Sebastian Mahfood said...

Fr. Martin2B, I commend you for your efforts at ecumenism and unity through your introduction of the thoughts of a non-Catholic minister. This is one of the four cornerstones of Kenrick's global vision plan, which also includes evangelization/inculturation, authentic human development, and interfaith dialogue. Moreover, I appreciate the citation in full since there's a great value in this man's thoughts on how wrath is an essential attribute of G-d though you should feel free to summarize arguments where you feel capable of doing so in order that you might provide your own analyses within them.

You've aptly stated a point to be made in ministerial engagement: "we as disciples of Christ and as future ministers have a very fine line to walk between rebuking in justice as Jesus did, while not giving into the very vice which we try to avoid." In rebuking the sin, how do we show appropriate righteous indignation in a way that is loving toward the sinner? Dante very clearly has no love for Filippo Argenti and actually revels in seeing him consumed by wrath in hell to the point that he wishes the other sinners would set upon Argenti and rip him to pieces -- a wish they satisfy not because Dante wished it but because it was in their predisposition to do so.

S.

January 17, 2005 8:46 PM  
Blogger Sebastian Mahfood said...

Filippo Argenti isn't just a sinner in Dante's cosmology, Atskro; he is an archetype of immoderate anger. You write that you "found Dante's berating of a soul discomforting" because even "though we are to reject evil, We [sic] are not to hate the sinner." In Dante's case, he exhibits a kind of righteous indignation of which human reason approves, appropriately berating the sin in the guise of its personification. If if helps you any, there are others in hell to whom Dante shows a greater respect (take his interaction with Farinata and Cavalcanti, who you'll come across in the cemetary of the heretics, or his act of kindness on the unknown Florentine suicide in the Wood of the Suicides) and still others to whom he shows greater wrath (ripping the hair out of Bocca Degli Abbati's head in Cocytus or outright lying to Friar Alberigo whose eyes are frozen shut and can't see that Dante's alive). There are apparent inconsistencies, then, in Dante's interactions on the literal level. If you want to understand them, you have to look higher to the symbolism, the morality, and G-d's ultimate plan for all things. Keep notes on things Dante does that you disagree with alongside notes on things that Dante does that you agree with, and within the comparisons that you will draw, you'll find satisfaction.

Finally, we know that human reason can only take Dante so far -- it has limits of its own and perhaps this is one of them. Virgil will disappear at the top of purgatory and Dante will be guided by a soul who is filled with grace. Before that happens, however, he has to be purged of sin, which means he has to understand it and seek reconciliation with G-d as a result of it. His travels through hell are that process of recognition, and just as Dante will spend time on the cornice of pride after his death sends his soul to purgatory, he will also spend time on the cornice of the wrathful since pride and wrath walk together.

S.

January 17, 2005 9:06 PM  
Blogger Sebastian Mahfood said...

I've added to the activities link a short sermon entitled "Saved from Wrath," delivered by one of our Protestant brothers.

S.

January 17, 2005 9:14 PM  
Blogger Fr. Earl Meyer said...

I found it diffiuclt to see Dante's treatment of Argenti as righteous indignation, such as that of Christ in the temple. I am reading a commentary by Jules Gelernt who admits of various interpretations here. One is that Dante is still very much a sinner. He is not a representative of God's justice on this journey; he is a pilgrim learning of his own weaknesses. The jounrey is to further his repentence. This interpretation sees his unkind treatment of Argenti as wrongful revenge incited by their previous earthly confrontations. Here he learns that he himself is guilty of anger and wrath. This may be a minority interpretation, but I find it helpful.

January 18, 2005 3:24 PM  
Blogger Sebastian Mahfood said...

I appreciate Gelernt's interpretation, Fr. Earl. Dante doesn't master sin all at once -- he's still very much a sinner, and we see this in dozens of different ways -- Virgil corrects him on lots of things so that Dante grows through his experience in hell. He is, in fact, the only round character we find in the entire place (heaven is also full of flat characters -- where we find round characters is purgatory, where everyone is engaging in a process of growth and discovery) though it could be argued that Virgil also has his moments of growth.

If Dante "is a pilgrim learning of his own weaknesses," Virgil as his guide should be able to interpret them more fully for him. Rather than praise him and bless the mother who bore him, Virgil could have chastened his zeal to engage in the very act for which Styx is noted. Nonetheless, perhaps this also gives us insight into Virgil's weaknesses and explains why he, himself, isn't enjoying the beatific vision (after all, his fourth eclogue, as we shall see when we enter Purgatory, should have been a sufficient messianic vision for him to have been among the elect). Whatever the cause, don't think that this journey is one of repentence but of recognition -- Dante really won't understand his soul as penitent until he climbs the mountain. Right now, he's just trying to understand the nature of sin. If he finds anger and wrath within himself, human reason reinforces, rather than banishes, it, so there's no growth; consequently, there's no repentence.

S.

January 19, 2005 12:05 AM  
Blogger Sebastian Mahfood said...

Folks, due to popular demand, I attach Book 2, Chapter 9, of Aristotle's Nicomachaen Ethics, which we're scheduled to read in Paradise but which may contribute to your thoughts on Dante's treatment of Filippo Argenti:

"That moral virtue is a mean, then, and in what sense it is so, and that it is a mean between two vices, the one involving excess, the other deficiency, and that it is such because its character is to aim at what is intermediate in passions and in actions, has been sufficiently stated. Hence also it is no easy task to be good. For in everything it is no easy task to find the middle, e.g. to find the middle of a circle is not for every one but for him who knows; so, too, any one can get angry -- that is easy -- or give or spend money; but to do this to the right person, to the right extent, at the right time, with the right motive, and in the right way, that is not for every one, nor is it easy; wherefore goodness is both rare and laudable and noble.

"Hence he who aims at the intermediate must first depart from what is the more contrary to it, as Calypso advises --

"Hold the ship out beyond that surf and spray.

"For of the extremes one is more erroneous, one less so; therefore, since to hit the mean is hard in the extreme, we must as a second best, as people say, take the least of the evils; and this will be done best in the way we describe. But we must consider the things towards which we ourselves also are easily carried away; for some of us tend to one thing, some to another; and this will be recognizable from the pleasure and the pain we feel. We must drag ourselves away to the contrary extreme; for we shall get into the intermediate state by drawing well away from error, as people do in straightening sticks that are bent.

"Now in everything the pleasant or pleasure is most to be guarded against; for we do not judge it impartially. We ought, then, to feel towards pleasure as the elders of the people felt towards Helen, and in all circumstances repeat their saying; for if we dismiss pleasure thus we are less likely to go astray. It is by doing this, then, (to sum the matter up) that we shall best be able to hit the mean.

"But this is no doubt difficult, and especially in individual cases; for or is not easy to determine both how and with whom and on what provocation and how long one should be angry; for we too sometimes praise those who fall short and call them good-tempered, but sometimes we praise those who get angry and call them manly. The man, however, who deviates little from goodness is not blamed, whether he do so in the direction of the more or of the less, but only the man who deviates more widely; for he does not fail to be noticed. But up to what point and to what extent a man must deviate before he becomes blameworthy it is not easy to determine by reasoning, any more than anything else that is perceived by the senses; such things depend on particular facts, and the decision rests with perception. So much, then, is plain, that the intermediate state is in all things to be praised, but that we must incline sometimes towards the excess, sometimes towards the deficiency; for so shall we most easily hit the mean and what is right."

Any thoughts on this?

S.

January 19, 2005 2:52 AM  
Blogger PadreDunny said...

"Come sail away, come sail away, come sail away with me.." On the river Styx, no thanks. This canto reminds me of the band named for this infernal river, or swamp, of stink and filth. A river of life it is not. I remember listening to Styx (Come on, who can forget "Mr. Roboto"? Right, Mr Skrobotto? ) wondering where one might find out the names of the rivers in Hell, as well as if I should listen to a band named for something in Hell. Hell, yeah! Just kidding, there. Is it strange.. i seem to be connecting these cantos with pop culture- music, movies, etc. Hmm, what does that say?

Anyway, as Dante and Virgil are among the wrathful, it is reasonable to assume that they are not impervious to their surroundings, particularly Dante, as Virgil is already a damned soul. The hate, incidentally another name for the river Styx, the river of hate, OK, the wrath, a better word, that Dante seethes toward Filippo Argenti, is part of the human condition, part of our consupiscence. Some more that others, to be sure, but still present.
Was Dante right? No, but that illustrates those who are in hell, does it not? They aren't thinking clearly or rightly. Dante's curse, is pretty powerful, "May you weep and wail to all eternity, for I know you, hell-dog, filthy as you are!" Whew! I'll have to remember that one!

Seriously, though, there is a fine line between justice and wrath. I'll have to go back and watch the video and read the other comments to this section.

As we come upon the city of Dis, it is interesting to note that Virgil needs assistance, as if he can no longer exert his power over others in their way. Reason is not enough. He needs some Divine Aid...

January 23, 2005 10:56 AM  
Blogger Sebastian Mahfood said...

Yes, PadreDunny, there is a significant connection between what you'll find in the Comedy and what we it seems we have in pop culture -- for two reasons: One, a lot of pop cultural icons are drawn directly or indirectly out of Dante (after all, we've had almost 700 years to absorb his work even if it only became popular in this country with Longfellow's translation in 1867), leading themselves to rock bands, horror movies, etc. Two, Dante is really an encyclopedist, trying to capture the human condition through its state of being, and because his descriptions of those states are highly transcendent of the time and place in which Dante expouses them, a lot of what you're reading will sound as though it rings true.

As for Virgil's needing divine aid, it is true that reason alone will have trouble prevailing in a land of madness, for madness is reason's antithesis. The angels have a power that no one in hell has -- they have grace, which they know how to use. Dante, too, has grace because he hasn't sin it by dying, but he won't learn how to use it for many, many cantos.

S.

January 25, 2005 4:34 PM  
Blogger lisahunor3604864122 said...

Get your High School Diploma, Or any Desired College Degree, In less then 2 weeks.

Call this number now 24 hours a day 7 days a week (413) 208-3069

Get these Degrees NOW!!!

High School Diploma "BA", "BSc", "MA", "MSc", "MBA", "PHD",

Get everything within 2 weeks.
100% verifiable, this is a real deal

Act now you owe it to your future.

(413) 208-3069 call now 24 hours a day, 7 days a week.

April 29, 2006 6:24 PM  
Blogger Roro44 said...

شات دردشه دردشة منتديات حواء بطاقات حب شات خليجي شات عربي شات سعودي خدمات مسجات شات صوتي تبادل نصي دليل مواقع دليل مواقع مواقع سعودية مواقع اماراتية مواقع عراقية مواقع كويتية مواقع عمانية مواقع قطرية سياحة مواقع يمنية مواقع بحرينية دليل مواقع برامج دردشات تحميل العاب العاب بنات شات سعودي شات عربي شات خايجي دردشة سعودية دردشة عربية دردشة خليجية شات كتابي دردشة كتابية

May 16, 2008 10:31 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home